Al-Ghazali: Incoherence of the Philosophers
Michael E. Marmura
Hardback
9780842524667
Contents:
[PART ONE]
[First] Discussion: On refuting their doctrine of the world's past eternity
[Second] Discussion: On refuting their statement on the post-eternity of the world, time, and motion
[Third] Discussion: On showing their obfuscation in saying that God is the world's enactor and maker...
[Fourth] Discussion: On showing their inability to prove the existence of the Maker of the world
[Fifth] Discussion: On showing their inability to prove that God is one...
[Sixth] Discussion: [On the divine attributes]
[Seventh] Discussion: On refuting their statement that the First cannot share with another in terms of genus...
[Eighth] Discussion: On refuting their statement that the existence of the First is simple...
[Ninth] Discussion: On showing their inability to sustain a proof that the First is not a body
[Tenth] Discussion: On their inability to show the world has a maker and a cause
[Eleventh] Discussion: On showing the impotence of those among them who perceive that the First knows other[s] and knows the genera and species in a universal way
[Twelfth] Discussion: On showing their inability to prove that He also knows Himself
[Thirteenth] Discussion: On Refuting their statement that God... does not know the particulars divisible in terms of temporal division into what is, what was, and what will be
[Fourteenth] Discussion: On their inability to set a proof [to show] that heaven is an animal that obeys God... through its circular motion
[Fifteenth] Discussion: On refuting what they mentioned concerning the purpose that moves heaven
[Sixteenth] Discussion: On refuting their statement that the souls of the heavens know all the particulars that occur in this world...
[PART TWO: The Natural Sciences]
[Seventeenth] Discussion: [On causality and miracles]
[Eighteenth] Discussion: On their inability to sustain a rational demonstration [proving] that the human soul is a self-subsistent spiritual substance...
[Nineteenth] Discussion: On refuting their statement that it is impossible for human souls to undergo annihilation...
[Twentieth] Discussion: On refuting their denial of bodily resurrection...